Foundation Pharmacist SJT Practice Paper 2025 – Volume 2
Build confidence, sharpen your professional judgement and practise under realistic timed conditions with 52 pharmacy-focused SJT scenarios, complete answers and detailed rationales.
Prepare for the Foundation Pharmacist Situational Judgement Test with a complete practice paper designed to develop the judgement, prioritisation and decision-making skills needed for pharmacy practice.
Volume 2 contains 52 realistic scenarios covering patient safety, person-centred care, communication, teamwork, governance, professionalism and working within the limits of your competence.
The paper follows two key SJT formats:
29 scenarios requiring you to rank five responses from most to least appropriate
23 scenarios requiring you to select the three most appropriate actions
A recommended completion time of 104 minutes
Clear links to relevant Professional Attributes Framework domains
Complete answers with explanations for every response
Detailed rationales explaining why the strongest actions work together
Post-paper reflection questions to identify areas for further development
Rather than simply giving you an answer key, the paper explains why each action is appropriate or inappropriate. This helps you recognise the principles behind strong professional decisions and apply them confidently to unfamiliar scenarios.
Ideal for:
Foundation Trainee Pharmacists preparing for the SJT
MPharm students developing professional judgement
Candidates looking for additional practice beyond Volume 1
Anyone wanting to improve their approach to pharmacy-based ethical and safety scenarios
This is a full-length, pharmacy-specific practice resource, not a collection of generic interview questions. Each scenario encourages you to balance immediate patient safety, professional accountability, communication and appropriate escalation without acting beyond your authority.
Complete it under timed conditions, review every rationale and use the reflection section to focus your remaining preparation.
Practise the decisions, not just the answer patterns.
